Archive for the ‘Freemasonry’ Category

Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 2

Tuesday, February 12th, 2008

A terrible monster weaving his net across the

No matter how much the will try to deny or hide the terrible truth revealed from the top of by , the symbols, rituals and the effects of their actions still betray them. Certainly, most of the are just a mob for those at the higher ranks who know the nature of the being they serve and deliberately attract the others in this immense hoax, which is, obviously, Satanism.

It’s only at rank thirty from the Scottish Communion, called the Royal Arch, that the masons receive the explicit proof that they worship a demon, a horrible monster. At this rank they are revealed the name and look of the Great Architect. Here is what Iuri Lina discovered: “The reality behind the scenes reveals itself to be completely different as one rises through the degrees. In countries, is portrayed as , but in Islamic countries it wears a Muslim face. In reality, the order worships another being, the Great Architect of the Universe, Jahbulon, whose nature bears a strong resemblance to that of . Only upon attaining a high degree is the freemason informed that the Great Architect of the Universe is called Jahbulon. In the degree called the Holy Royal Arch (13th), the appearance of the masonic Jahbulon is revealed. He has a spider’s body and three heads - that of a cat, a toad, and a human head.”

The English researcher Stephen Knight made an interview with fifty-seven over the rank thirteen. They answered without problem to every question until it came to the issue of Jahbulon and they were asked: “And how are things with Jahbulon?” Knight says: “At that moment, things became tense, they tried to change the subject, they didn’t want to continue the interview or they said embarrassing lies.”

It is understandable why the avoid talking about this subject. They venerate a terrible demon, represented by a terrible corruption of the divine Trinity. This spider with three heads spreads his net over the entire planet to catch as many souls as possible in his trap. This is why at the entrance of every Masonic temple there is an earth globe, caught in a net. The same symbol appears on the flags of organizations with Masonic origins as an expression of the current planetary Masonic trap.

Will be continued in the following days with argument 3

Bibliography: Yogaesoteric

Related posts

Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 1

Monday, February 11th, 2008

worships -Satan

always claimed to worship the Great Architect as . The statements of important , the symbols used in their rituals and the Masonic emblems prove that is a and that this Great Architect is not , but Satan-.

Famous Mason: Albert Pike (pictured) has been one of the most prominent figures from the Scottish Communion, and his ideas were often labelled as . Nevertheless in the January 1990 issue of the New Age Magazine, published by the Charleston USA branch of the Scottish Communion, the most important paper of – “Ethics and dogma”, written in 1871 –is introduced as the “Masonic guide for daily life”. In another Masonic journal published in the Internet, also belonging to the Scottish Communion (Scottish Rite Journal) we find the following praises to , which proves the very important role he still plays in the Communion: “Brother Mark Twain once remarked that you could tell the character of a nation by the character of the men to whom it built monuments or the events it chooses to commemorate. That is probably true. It is certainly true in the case of , one of the most influential of American . His name has been attached to schools, streets, scholarships, stained-glass windows, Masonic Lodges, and many other places. Even a special fragrance in men’s soap and cologne has been named after him.”

This significant reference may evince how much the “values” have hallmarked the modern society, which is quite alarming, considering the ideas preached by . The defend themselves trying to present as a marginal character, hardly read and known. How come then, that to the name of this “unimportant” figure the raised a memorial, on the very spot of his grave, which is the (pictured) from Washington DC? That is right the central headquarter of the of rank thirty-three from the Scottish Communion. To paraphrase the quotation mentioned before, we can say that we can tell the nature of the according to the persons they raise monuments for.

In July- 1889, had to participate as the of the Universal (a very high rank in ) at the Convention of the from Paris, where they had to find a solution for a dispute between the and the . The conflict burst out on the verge of a key problem, that of the that the worship. The French considered that there should not be another but the human or humanity, conception that later gave birth to a new cultural trend, defined as humanism. The English did not agree and supported the necessity of the existence of a religious component.

had the role to conciliate the two camps, with his high rank he was the one could say the true nature of the “” the masons worship always without knowing. Due to some health trouble he could not go to France, therefore he sent a letter, from which fragments were reproduced in publication at that time, both in France and in England. He wrote: “That which we must say to the crowd is “We worship a , but it is the that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General [of the 33rd degree], we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees: “The Masonic should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. [...] the true and pure philosophic is the belief in , the equal of .”

Will be continued the following days with argument 2

Bibliography : Yogaesoteric

Related posts

Freemasonry about: God, Jesus and implications for Christians

Saturday, February 9th, 2008

- The Nature of
Although requires members to acknowledge a “” in order to be accepted into the , the of and the of the are not the same. There is a great difference between the two concepts of . The Masonic , “The Great Architect of the Universe” (G.A.O.T.U), or the “Grand Artificer of the Universe,” is an all-inclusive “Life Principle” that lies within all living things. In , is not a personal being, but an impersonal force, an energy that has no substance. In theistic terms, this belief is known as pantheism.

As the unifier of all religions, holds that “the , the Hebrew, the Moslem, the , the followers of Confucius and Zoroaster, can assemble as brethren and unite in prayer to the one who is above all the Baalim.” (Pike, Morals and Dogma) In other words, the biblical is reduced to the level of all the other gods and rendered as equal with the gods of those religions. Therefore, by definition, is a “” of plurality that strips all others of there uniqueness.

- The Nature of
has adopted a pluralist approach toward Christ. Generally, Masonry teaches, “ was just a man. He was one of the exemplars, one of the great men of the past, but not divine and certainly not the only means of redemption of lost mankind. He was on a level with other great men of the past like Aristotle, Plato, and . His life and legend were no different from that of , the Hindu . He is the son of Joseph, not the Son of .” (, The Deadly Deception, 1988)

In Masonry, Christ is not to be looked upon as the Savior, Redeemer or incarnate. He is to be viewed as no different than any other great prophet, spiritual leader or guru. The does not permit the name of or Christ to be used in any of its prayers or rituals, and when the is used in , all scriptural references to are removed. “All prayers in lodges should be directed to the one deity to whom all Masons refer to as the of the Universe.” (The Maryland Master , March 1973)

- Are There Any Implications For Christians?
is responsible for many noble causes. Nobody can deny the social and charitable works done by the Brotherhood. However, as a “religious” institution, there are beliefs and practices in Masonry that are incompatible with biblical Christianity. The who professes to be a must decide whom he will serve: the of the or the of . He cannot serve both. Ultimately, every who participates in Masonry must ask himself, “What does the teach us to do with Christ?” “The who is a is put in a very difficult position. Although his Fraternal Order supported his Christianity in its early years, it now no longer allows for it, as there is no question about the pagan orientation of in our day. Therefore, the must ask himself whether he can, in good faith, remain a part of an organization that devalues the of Christianity.” (, and the , 2002)

Related posts

Is Freemasonry a religion ?

Saturday, February 9th, 2008

Baphomet, god of FreemasonryThe ’s official position states that is not a . “Masons who treat it as such are mistaken. strongly encourages its members to belong to an established , although this is not a requirement for membership (only that a candidate profess a belief in a Supreme Being). Masonry is a fraternal organization that encourages and charity and studies philosophy. It has no clergy, no sacraments, and does not promise salvation to its members.” (, Difficult Questions About , 2002)

A close assessment of the degrees of uncovers a basic theology that lies beneath everything in the Order. The degrees instruct that: There is a Supreme Being who created the universe, who has established and revealed a moral , and to whom we must give account in a life after this. Masons argue that nothing in these five points, which are supported by all the materials, lectures and “working tools” of the degrees, conflicts with any of the major religions of the Western . As such, all religions are welcome to participate in the Brotherhood, and thus, it should not be deemed a “religious” organization. “The true is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his that as a his must be universal: Christ, Buddha, or , the name means little, for he recognizes only the light and not the bearer.”(Manly Hall, The Lost Keys of , 1976)

Many scholars call the “unifier” of all religions. “It is the universal, eternal, immutable , such as planted it in the heart of universal humanity.”(, Morals and Dogma, 1950) “Every Masonic is a temple of ; and its teachings are instruction in .” (Pike) “Masonry is all that remains to us of the first ” which flourished in ancient times. “It was the first unified . Today we are working again towards a universal .” (Foster Bailey, The Spirit of Masonry, 1979)

Documentation source: allaboutcults.org

Related posts

Recently condemned secret societies

Tuesday, February 5th, 2008

The order of Odd-Fellows was formed in England in 1812 as a completed organization, though some lodges date back to 1745; and it was introduced into America in 1819. In the “Odd-Fellows’ Improved Pocket Manual” the author writes: “Our institution has instinctively, as it were, copied after all associations ofreligious and  moral character.” The “North-West Odd-Fellow Review” (May, 1895) declares: “No home can be an ideal one unless the principles of our good and glorious Order are represented therein, and its teachings made the rule of life.” In the “New Odd-Fellows’ Manual” (N.Y., 1895) the author says: “The written as well as the unwritten work of the Order, I have sacredly kept unrevealed,” though the book is dedicated “to all inquirers who desire to know what Odd-Fellowship really is.” This book tells us “Odd-Fellowship was founded on great religious principles” ; “we useforms of worship” ; ” , Christianity, Mohammedanism recognize the only living and true ” . The Odd-Fellows have chaplains, altars, high-priests, ritual, order of worship, and funeral .

The order of the was founded in New York in 1842 and introduced into England in 1846. The “Cyclopaedia of Fraternities” says: “The took the lead in England in demonstrating the propriety and practicability of both men and women mingling in society lodges.” That the object of this order and its kindred is not confined to temperance “is evidenced by its mode of initiation, the form of the obligation and the manner of religious worship” .

The order of the Knights of Pythias was founded in 1864 by prominent (Cyclop. of Fraternities, p. 263). In number, its membership is second only to that of the Odd-Fellows. Rosen (The and ) says: “The principal objectionable features, on account of which the has forbidden its members to join the Knights of Pythias, and demanded a withdrawal of those who joined it, are: First, the oath of secrecy by which the member binds himself to keep whatever concerns the doings of the Order, even from those in and State who have a right to know, under certain conditions, what their subjects are doing. Secondly, this oath binds the member to blind obedience, which is symbolized by a test. Such an obedience is against the of man’s nature, and against all divine and human . Thirdly, Christ is not the teacher and model in the rule of life but the pagan and the pagans Damon, Pythias and Dionysius” . The “Ritual for the subordinate Lodges of the Knights of Pythias” (Chicago, 1906) shows that this organization has oaths, degrees, prelates, and a ritual that contains religious worship.

The decree of the Holy Office concerning the Odd-Fellows, , and Knights of Pythias, though not declaring them to be under censure, says: “The must endeavour by all means to keep the faithful from joining all and each of the three aforesaid ; and warn the faithful against them, and if, after proper monition, they still determine to be members of these , or do not effectually separate themselves from them, they are to be forbidden the reception of the sacraments. A decree of 18 Jan., 1896, allows a nominal membership in these three , if in the judgment of the , four conditions are fulfilled: that the society was entered in good faith, that there be no scandal, that grave temporal injury would result from withdrawal, and that there be no danger of perversion. The delegate, in granting a dispensation, usually requires a promise that the person will not attend any meetings or frequent the -rooms, that the dues be sent in by mail or by a third party, and that in case of death the society will have nothing to do with the funeral.

Related posts