Secret Societies and Symbols

Demons on the British masonry frontage

The Satanic symbols appear on the most important Masonic buildings. The central headquarters of the Great United Lodge of England from London, called Masonic Hall, the cradle of the modern freemasonry carries just above the entrance a Masonic emblem (pictured) which they spread all over the world. The same emblem even occurs as a signboard of a restaurant nearby, open for masons only. There it becomes conspicuous, as the beings displaying angel wings and hoofs instead of feet keep the shield from the middle, as if they were demons.

Under these hoofed angels, meaning fallen angels, there is this defining inscription for the freemasonry doctrine: “Audi, Vide, Tace” meaning “Hearing, Seeing, and Say Nothing” i.e. keep the secret no matter what you see or hear inside the freemasonry. This motto is an abbreviation from a Latin proverb “Audi, vide, tace si vis vivere (remanere) in pace” – “hear, see, and say nothing if you want to live/ be left in peace”. Meaningful, we may say, and perfectly illustrated by the fact that all those who will not conceal the freemasonry secrets are not left alive and in peace.

Freemasonry had to create a genuine conspiracy of silence just because of their satanic nature, which they had to keep secret. Should it be a charitable and mutual aid organization as alleged, why all these terrible oaths inflicted to all brothers for their silence? “I swear that I will never reveal the secret of the freemasonry only to a lodge brother and in the presence of the venerable great master. In case of deviation from this oath, I resign myself to this punishment: my tongue to be wrested, my heart to be pierced, and my body to be crushed and turned to ash for the wind”…this is what their oaths sound like.

This kind of “oaths” can only belong to a diabolic organization. In addition, the fact that they are not only an image is fully proved by the death under strange circumstances of some insiders who betrayed the freemasonry.

There is much more to say on this subject, since all the Masonic symbols and rituals are strongly imbued by the satanic meaning. In all Masonic writings, we shall find the time measured in Anno Lucis not in Anno Domini-which means the age starting with the birth of Jesus Christ. Anno Lucis is four thousand years added to Anno Domini, so the year 2006 becomes 6006. The masons deny that they even measure time related to Lucifer, claiming that Lucis means light, and that it is the light of knowledge which is good.

    We can see the nature of this light in the next Masonic illustrations. In these illustrations the ritual of initiation in the first rank is given a symbolical representation. In the upper side of both pictures the Sun and Moon are represented, but it’s not the Sun always associated to God the Father that enlightens the lodge; there is another light, coming from a star. It’s the star that rises brightly and marks the beginning of a new era, The New World Order that is a central symbol in freemasonry. This bright star is the Morning Star, named by the ancient astronomers as it is the last star remaining in the sky, in the morning, competing with the Sun light, just like Lucifer. The latter one is also called “the child of the morning” and claims to be on a par with God.

Therefore, it turns obvious that even from the first steps in freemasonry everything spins around some satanic concepts and doctrines. What freemasons and their elders forget is that in the end the Sun light becomes so strong that no matter how bright the Morning Star can shine, it will eventually disappear for good. Its power is just fleeting, and the light it casts is but a pale reflection of the Sun light. Things will be he same with freemasonry, even if they temporarily succeeded to weave their net around this planet. To conclude in the words of a well-known author who disclosed freemasonry, he said: “it carries within the seed of its own annihilation” by worshipping a being that opposes the divine order.

And there you have it three arguments collected by me from the web that state Freemasonry is a satanic sect, i will leave you draw the conclusions.

Bibliography: Yogaesoteric

Related posts

• Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 2 (0)
• Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 1 (0)
• Is Freemasonry a religion ? (1)
• Freemasonry about: God, Jesus and implications for Christians (2)
• An Observation on Freemasonry (1)

A terrible monster weaving his net across the world

No matter how much the freemasons will try to deny or hide the terrible truth revealed from the top of freemasonry by Albert Pike, the symbols, rituals and the effects of their actions still betray them. Certainly, most of the freemasons are just a mob for those at the higher ranks who know the nature of the being they serve and deliberately attract the others in this immense hoax, which is, obviously, Satanism.

It’s only at rank thirty from the Scottish Communion, called the Royal Arch, that the masons receive the explicit proof that they worship a demon, a horrible monster. At this rank they are revealed the name and look of the Great Architect. Here is what Iuri Lina discovered: “The reality behind the scenes reveals itself to be completely different as one rises through the degrees. In Christian countries, freemasonry is portrayed as Christian, but in Islamic countries it wears a Muslim face. In reality, the order worships another being, the Great Architect of the Universe, Jahbulon, whose nature bears a strong resemblance to that of Lucifer. Only upon attaining a high degree is the freemason informed that the Great Architect of the Universe is called Jahbulon. In the degree called the Holy Royal Arch (13th), the appearance of the masonic god Jahbulon is revealed. He has a spider’s body and three heads - that of a cat, a toad, and a human head.”

The English researcher Stephen Knight made an interview with fifty-seven freemasons over the rank thirteen. They answered without problem to every question until it came to the issue of Jahbulon and they were asked: “And how are things with Jahbulon?” Knight says: “At that moment, things became tense, they tried to change the subject, they didn’t want to continue the interview or they said embarrassing lies.”

It is understandable why the freemasons avoid talking about this subject. They venerate a terrible demon, represented by a terrible corruption of the divine Trinity. This spider with three heads spreads his net over the entire planet to catch as many souls as possible in his trap. This is why at the entrance of every Masonic temple there is an earth globe, caught in a net. The same symbol appears on the flags of world organizations with Masonic origins as an expression of the current planetary Masonic trap.

Will be continued in the following days with argument 3

Bibliography: Yogaesoteric

Related posts

• Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 3 (0)
• Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 1 (0)
• Is Freemasonry a religion ? (1)
• Freemasonry about: God, Jesus and implications for Christians (2)
• An Observation on Freemasonry (1)

Freemasonry worships Lucifer-Satan

Freemasonry always claimed to worship the Great Architect as God. The statements of important freemasons, the symbols used in their rituals and the Masonic emblems prove that freemasonry is a satanic sect and that this Great Architect is not God, but Satan-Lucifer.

Albert Pike (pictured) has been one of the most prominent mason figures from the Scottish Communion, and his ideas were often labelled as satanic. Nevertheless in the January 1990 issue of the New Age Magazine, published by the Charleston USA branch of the Scottish Communion, the most important paper of Albert Pike – “Ethics and dogma”, written in 1871 –is introduced as the “Masonic guide for daily life”. In another Masonic journal published in the Internet, also belonging to the Scottish Communion (Scottish Rite Journal) we find the following praises to Albert Pike, which proves the very important role he still plays in the Communion: “Brother Mark Twain once remarked that you could tell the character of a nation by the character of the men to whom it built monuments or the events it chooses to commemorate. That is probably true. It is certainly true in the case of Albert Pike, one of the most influential of American Freemasons. His name has been attached to schools, streets, scholarships, stained-glass windows, Masonic Lodges, and many other places. Even a special fragrance in men’s soap and cologne has been named after him.”

This significant reference may evince how much the mason “values” have hallmarked the modern society, which is quite alarming, considering the ideas preached by Albert Pike. The freemasons defend themselves trying to present Albert Pike as a marginal character, hardly read and known. How come then, that to the name of this “unimportant” figure the freemasonry raised a memorial, on the very spot of his grave, which is the House of Temple (pictured) from Washington DC? That is right the central headquarter of the Supreme Council of rank thirty-three from the Scottish Communion. To paraphrase the quotation mentioned before, we can say that we can tell the nature of the freemasonry according to the persons they raise monuments for.

In July- 1889, Albert Pike had to participate as the Sovereign Pontiff of the Universal Freemasonry (a very high rank in freemasonry) at the Convention of the Supreme Council from Paris, where they had to find a solution for a dispute between the French lodges and the English lodges. The conflict burst out on the verge of a key problem, that of the god that the freemasons worship. The French considered that there should not be another god but the human or humanity, conception that later gave birth to a new cultural trend, defined as humanism. The English did not agree and supported the necessity of the existence of a religious component.

Albert Pike had the role to conciliate the two camps, with his high rank he was the one could say the true nature of the “god” the masons worship always without knowing. Due to some health trouble he could not go to France, therefore he sent a letter, from which fragments were reproduced in mason publication at that time, both in France and in England. He wrote: “That which we must say to the crowd is “We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General [of the 33rd degree], we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees: “The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. [...] the true and pure philosophic religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of God.”

Will be continued the following days with argument 2

Bibliography : Yogaesoteric

Related posts

• Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 3 (0)
• Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 2 (0)
• Is Freemasonry a religion ? (1)
• Freemasonry about: God, Jesus and implications for Christians (2)
• An Observation on Freemasonry (1)

Freemasonry - The Nature of God
Although Freemasonry requires members to acknowledge a “god” in order to be accepted into the Lodge, the god of Freemasonry and the God of the Bible are not the same. There is a great difference between the two concepts of God. The Masonic god, “The Great Architect of the Universe” (G.A.O.T.U), or the “Grand Artificer of the Universe,” is an all-inclusive “Life Principle” that lies within all living things. In Freemasonry, god is not a personal being, but an impersonal force, an energy that has no substance. In theistic terms, this belief is known as pantheism.

As the unifier of all religions, Freemasonry holds that “the Christian, the Hebrew, the Moslem, the Brahmin, the followers of Confucius and Zoroaster, can assemble as brethren and unite in prayer to the one god who is above all the Baalim.” (Pike, Morals and Dogma) In other words, the biblical God is reduced to the level of all the other gods and rendered as equal with the gods of those religions. Therefore, by definition, Freemasonry is a “religion” of plurality that strips all others of there uniqueness.

Freemasonry - The Nature of Jesus
Freemasonry has adopted a pluralist approach toward Jesus Christ. Generally, Masonry teaches, “Jesus was just a man. He was one of the exemplars, one of the great men of the past, but not divine and certainly not the only means of redemption of lost mankind. He was on a level with other great men of the past like Aristotle, Plato, Pythagoras and Mohammed. His life and legend were no different from that of Krishna, the Hindu god. He is the son of Joseph, not the Son of God.” (Jim Shaw, The Deadly Deception, 1988)

In Masonry, Jesus Christ is not to be looked upon as the Savior, Redeemer or God incarnate. He is to be viewed as no different than any other great prophet, spiritual leader or guru. The Lodge does not permit the name of Jesus or Christ to be used in any of its prayers or rituals, and when the Bible is used in ceremonies, all scriptural references to Jesus are removed. “All prayers in Mason lodges should be directed to the one deity to whom all Masons refer to as the Grand Architect of the Universe.” (The Maryland Master Mason, March 1973)

Freemasonry - Are There Any Implications For Christians?
Freemasonry is responsible for many noble causes. Nobody can deny the social and charitable works done by the Brotherhood. However, as a “religious” institution, there are beliefs and practices in Masonry that are incompatible with biblical Christianity. The Mason who professes to be a Christian must decide whom he will serve: the God of the Bible or the god of Freemasonry. He cannot serve both. Ultimately, every Christian who participates in Masonry must ask himself, “What does the Lodge teach us to do with Jesus Christ?” “The Mason who is a Christian is put in a very difficult position. Although his Fraternal Order supported his Christianity in its early years, it now no longer allows for it, as there is no question about the pagan orientation of Freemasonry in our day. Therefore, the Mason must ask himself whether he can, in good faith, remain a part of an organization that devalues the God of Christianity.” (Russ Wise, Freemasonry and the Christian Church, 2002)

Related posts

• An Observation on Freemasonry (1)
• The Grand Architect of the Universe (2)
• Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 3 (0)
• Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 2 (0)
• Freemasonry a satanic sect : argument 1 (0)

Illuminati the name assumed by the members of a secret society founded by Adam Weishaupt in 1776. Weishaupt was born of Westphalian parents at Ingolstadt (Bavaria), on 6 February, 1748, and lost his father in 1753. Although educated at a Jesuit school, he fell early under the influence of his free-thinking godfather, the director of the high-school of Ickstatt, to whom he owed his appointment as professor of civil law at the University of Ingolstadt in 1772.

He was the first layman to occupy the chair of canon law at this university (1773), but, in consequence of the growing rationalistic influence which he exerted over the students both in his academic capacity and in his personal intercourse with them, he came into ever sharper collision with the loyal adherents of the Church and with those who were influential in government circles. As, furthermore, his obstinate nature led him to quarrel with almost everyone with whom his intercourse was at all prolonged, he felt the need of a powerful secret organization to support him in the conflict with his adversaries and in the execution of his rationalistic schemes along ecclesiastical and political lines.

At first (1774) he aimed at an arrangement with the Freemasons. Closer inquiry, however, destroyed his high estimate of this organization, and he resolved to found a new society which, surrounded with the greatest possible secrecy, would enable him most effectually to realize his aims and could at all times be precisely adapted to the needs of the age and local conditions. His order was to be based entirely on human nature and observation; hence its degrees, ceremonies, and statutes were to be developed only gradually; then, in the light of experience and wider knowledge, and with the co-operation of all the members, they were to be steadily improved.

For his prototype he relied mainly on Freemasonry, in accordance with which he modelled the degrees and ceremonial of his order. After the pattern of the Society of Jesus, though distorting to the point of caricature its essential features, he built up the strictly hierarchical organization of his society. “To utilize for good purposes the very means which that order employed for evil ends”, such was, according to Philo (Endl. Erkl., 60 sq.), “his pet design”. For the realization of his plans, he regarded as essential the “despotism of superiors” an the “blind, unconditionalobedience of subordinates” (ibid.), along with the utmost secrecy and mysteriousness.

At the beginning of 1777 he entered a Masonic Lodge and endeavoured, with other members of the order, to render Freemasonry as subservient as possible to his aims. As Weishaupt, however, despite all his activity as an agitator and the theoretic shrewdness he displayed, was at bottom only an unpractical bookworm, without the necessary experience of the world, his order for a long time made no headway. The accession to it, in 1780, of the Masonic agent Freiherr von Knigge (Philo), a man of wide experience and well known everywhere in Masonic circles, gave matters a decisive turn.

In company with Weishaupt, who, as a philosopher and jurist, evolved the ideas and main lines of the constitution, Knigge began to elaborate rapidly the necessary degrees and statutes (until 1780 the Minerval degree was the only one in use), and at the same time worked vigorously to extend the order, for which within two years he secured 500 members. When the great international convention of Freemasons was held at Wilhelmsbad (16 July to 29 August, 1782) the “Illuminated Freemasonry”, which Knigge and Weishaupt now proclaimed to be the only “pure” Freemasonry, had already gained such a reputation that almost all the members of the convention clamoured for admission into the new institution. Particularly valuable for the order was the accession of Bode (Amelius), who commanded the highest respect in all Masonic circles. Assisted by Bode, Knigge laboured diligently to convert the whole Masonic body into “Illuminated Freemasons”.

A number of the most prominent representatives of Freemasonry and “enlightenment” became Illuminati, including, in 1783, Duke Ferdinand of Brunswick, the foremost leader of European Freemasonry and the princely representative of the illuminism of his age. Other famous members were Goethe, Herder, and Nicolai. The order was also propagated in Sweden, Russia, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Austria, and France. But in 1783 dissensions arose between Knigge and Weishaupt, which resulted in the final withdrawal of the former on 1 July, 1784. Knigge could no longer endure Weishaupt’s pedantic domineering, which frequently assumed offensiveforms.

He accused Weishaupt of “Jesuitism”, and suspected him of being “a Jesuit in disguise” (Nachtr., I, 129). “And was I”, he adds, “to labour under his banner for mankind, to lead men under the yoke of so stiff-necked a fellow?–Never!”

Moreover, in 1783 the anarchistic tendencies of the order provoked public denunciations which led, in 1784, to interference on the part of the Bavarian Government. As the activity of the Illuminati still continued, four successive enactments were issued against them (22 June, 1784; 2 March, and 16 August, 1785; and 16 August, 1787), in the last of which recruiting for the order was forbidden under penalty of death.

These measures put an end to the corporate existence of the order in Bavaria, and, as a result of the publication, in 1786, of its degrees and of other documents concerning it–for the most part of a rather compromising nature–its further extension outside Bavaria became impossible. The spread of the spirit of the Illuminati, which coincided substantially with the general teachings of the “enlightenment”, especially that of France, was rather accelerated than retarded by the persecution in Bavaria. In two letters addressed to the Bishop of Freising (18 June and 12 November, 1785) Pius VI had also condemned the order.

As early as 16 February, 1785, Weishaupt had fled from Ingolstadt, and in 1787 he settled at Gotha. His numerous apologetic writings failed to exonerate either the order or himself. Being now the head of a numerous family, his views on religious and political matters grew more sober. After 1787 he renounced all active connexion with secret societies, and again drew near to the Church, displaying remarkable zeal in the building of the Catholic church at Gotha. he died on 18 November, 1830, “reconciled with the Catholic Church, which, as a youthful professor, he had doomed to death and destruction”–as the chronicle of the Catholic parish in Gotha relates.

Source:  Catholic Encyclopedia

Related posts

• Illuminati - short info (0)
• What is Freemasonry and what does it offer? (1)
• Recently condemned secret societies (2)
• Masonic symbols (1)
• Illuminati - The organization (1)